Bryan Cranston doesn’t read reviews because it “can get into your soul and start to corrupt you”

When it comes to acting, few would question the ability of someone as talented as Bryan Cranston. But even if they had, Cranston probably wouldn’t know. He doesn’t read reviews of his work. It seems like a rare characteristic for an actor, but Cranston has a compelling reason behind it.

Let’s take a closer look at an interview Cranston conducted about reading his own reviews, what his interview colleague thought of Cranston’s notions about it, and whether Cranston had ever received a bad review before.

Why Bryan Cranston Doesn’t Read Reviews

Cranston has worked as an actor for a long time. Before he hits hard breaking Bad, he had other important roles in comedies such as Malcolm in the middle like Father Hal, in a recurring cameo on Seinfeld like Tim Whatley, Jerry’s dentist. That means he knows a thing or two about movie and TV review criticism.

In a conversation with director M. Night Shyamalan for Magazine interview, Cranston asked about the effect of criticism on Shyamalan. Cranston took the opportunity to editorialize, speaking about his own relationship with criticism of his work:

“I don’t read reviews of my own work for this very reason. Good reviews are kind of smoke, and bad reviews are the ones that can get into your soul and start to corrupt you.

It’s an interesting approach, and it’s probably quite difficult for Cranston to maintain it these days. Cranston raised the issue because of Shyamalan’s polarization. He released box office hits beloved by critics and bombs that everyone hated. Shyamalan’s response was along the same lines.

What M. Night Shyamalan had to say about reading the reviews

After The sixth sense and Unbreakable, the critical acclaim for Shyamalan’s work began to dry up. He’s had a pretty long unsuccessful streak at the box office. He finally got back in shape with To divide, a horror film starring James McAvoy. The success of the film allowed Shyamalan to make the film Glass, who completed the Unbreakable trilogy.

Here’s what Shyamalan had to say in response to Cranston’s question:

“I’m exactly the same way, Bryan. I read absolutely nothing about myself. I get the gist of what’s going on, whether it’s been well received or not, but we want our relationship with our material, with our characters, to be the thing that obsesses us. If we start to think about reviews, we will start to calculate and be more secure. ”

The two men’s ideas here make a lot of sense, but how many times has Cranston found himself the target of harsh criticism? Although not often, he has appeared in films that do not seem to resonate with large audiences.

Most acclaimed (and least acclaimed) work by Bryan Cranston

Bryan Cranston attends Netflix’s “El Camino: A Breaking Bad Movie” Premiere | Axelle / Bauer-Griffin / Getty Images

Cranston has been critically acclaimed as the star of Breaking Bad. There he played sociopathic chemistry professor turned genius cook Walter White. Although Cranston had a long acting career before that, it was the role that turned him into A-List.

But not all of Cranston’s films have been well reviewed. Take the 2017 drama, Wakefield. Atlantic was ruthless, calling the drama “bizarre”, “strange” and “muted”. They called the end “disappointingly open”.

From Cranston’s perspective, it’s hard to imagine how reading such a review would help him do his job better. After all, the movie is over once the review is over. There is nothing he can do to improve the film or its performance. Every role he takes on is different, so it’s hard to say he could apply anything to his job in the future.

RELATED: Steamy Kiss Inspired Bryan Cranston to Start Playing: “Open Mouth, Tongue, Hands All Over – It Was Very Exciting”